Petition of William Good for Restitution for Sarah Good, Dorothy Good, & Infant
|
Recto
Facsimile
cornell.edu
|
|
Source Citation
|
UNCAT MS, Witchcraft Collection, no. 4620, Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections, Cornell University Library.
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 907: Petition of William Good for Restitution for Sarah Good, Dorothy Good, & Infant
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
Sept. 13, 1710: Petition for Payment
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 3, p. 994: Account of William Good -- Cases of Sarah Good and Dorcas Good
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 173.21: Petition of William Good for the Restitution for Sarah Good and Dorothy Good
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
N/A |
Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |