A Guide to the Primary Sources of the Salem Witch Trials
Indictment of Daniel Eames, for Afflicting Mary Warren (Returned Ignoramus) Back
Side 1

Small
virginia.edu

Medium
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Side 2

Small
virginia.edu

Medium
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Source Citation UNCAT MS, Miscellaneous Manuscripts (1692), Massachusetts Historical Society. Boston, MA.
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009) No. 843: Indictment of Daniel Eames, for Afflicting Mary Warren (Returned Ignoramus)
    No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document

    indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable

    indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
    [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned

    See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
  • May 09, 1693
  • : Indictment
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977) N/A
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019) No. 44a.2: Indictment of Daniel Eames, for Afflcting Mary Warren. Returned Ignoramus
44a.2: Indictment of Daniel Eames, for Afflcting Mary Warren. Returned Ignoramus
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) N/A
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960) N/A

| Manuscript Archives | Rare Books | Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt | Salem Witchcraft Papers | Woodward | Godbeer | Levin | Search