Letter of Thomas Putnam to John Hathorne & Jonathan Corwin
Back to Misc: Charles W. Upham: Salem Witchcraft (1867) | Back to Archive List
Source Citation Charles Wentworth Upham. Salem witchcraft; with an account of Salem village, and a history of opinions on witchcraft and kindred subjects, Volume 2 (Boston: Wiggin & Lunt, 1867), pp. 139-40.

Facsimile of original publication: http://www.archive.org/details/salemwitchcraft04uphagoog
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009) No. 82: Letter of Thomas Putnam to John Hathorne & Jonathan Corwin
  • April 21, 1692: Letter
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977) Vol. 1, pp. 165-166: Letter of Thomas Putnam to John Hathorne and Jonathan Corwin
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) not available


Home Page | Manuscript Archives | Rare Books | Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt | Salem Witchcraft Papers | Woodward (1864) | Search