Deposition of Samuel Parris, Thomas Putnam, & Ezekiel Cheever v. Sarah Good, Sarah Osburn, & Tituba
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, no. 34, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 8: Deposition of Samuel Parris, Thomas Putnam, & Ezekiel Cheever v. Sarah Good, Sarah Osburn, & Tituba
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
March 01, 1692†: Deposition
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
May 23, 1692: Sworn Deposition
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
June 28, 1692: Sworn Before the Grand Jury and at Trial
of Sarah Good
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 3, pp. 756-757: Samuel Parris v. Tituba
Vol. 3, pp. 756-757: Thomas Putnam & Ezekiel Cheever v. Tituba
|
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 125.9: Deposition of Samuel Parris v. Tituba
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 1, p. 49: Sam. Parris v. Tituba Indian
Vol. 1, p. 50: Tho. Putnam & Ezek Cheevers v. Tituba Indian
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
|
