Statement of Francis Dane Sr., Regarding Some of the Andover Accused
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, no. 319, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 745: Statement of Francis Dane Sr., Regarding Some of the Andover Accused
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
Jan. 2, 1693: Statement Against
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 3, pp. 881-883: Statement by the Rev. Francis Dane on the Andover Outbreak -- January 1693
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 167.6: Statement by the Rev. Francis Dane Regarding Some of the Andover Accused
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 2, pp. 66-68: Francis Dane Senr for Martha Carrier
|
Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |