Recognizance for Bethiah Carter Sr. by John Pierson & George Lilly
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Suffolk Court Files, vol. 32, docket 2697, p. 22, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, Massachusetts State Archives. Boston, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 716: Recognizance for Bethiah Carter Sr. by John Pierson & George Lilly
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
Dec. 8, 1692: Recognizance
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 205-206: Recognizance for Bethia Carter, Sr.
|
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 28.1: Recognizance for Bethia Carter, Sr. by John Pierson & George Lilly
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
N/A |
| Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
