Complaint of Mary Brown & Benjamin Larobe v. Sarah Cole (of Lynn)
Back to JA: Suffolk Court Collection, Vols. 31 & 32
|
Back to Archive List
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 3
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Suffolk Court Files, vol. 32, docket 2712, p. 49, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, Massachusetts State Archives. Boston, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 681: Complaint of Mary Brown & Benjamin Larobe v. Sarah Cole (of Lynn)
Oct. 1, 1692: Complaint
Oct. 3, 1692: Recognizance for Prosecution Given
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best
approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt |
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, p. 225: Complaint of Mary Brown v. Sarah Cole
Vol. 1, pp. 226-227: Complaint and Recognizance of Benjamin Larobe
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
not available |
