Statement of Samuel Parris Concerning Abigail Williams & Mary Walcott v. John Procter, Elizabeth Procter, Sarah Cloyce, Martha Cory, Rebecca Nurse, Sarah Good & Dorothy Good
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, no. 57, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 61: Statement of Samuel Parris Concerning Abigail Williams & Mary Walcott v. John Procter, Elizabeth Procter, Sarah Cloyce, Martha Cory, Rebecca Nurse, Sarah Good & Dorothy Good
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
April 12, 1692†: Statement Against
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 2, pp. 677-678: Abigail Williams v. John Proctor
|
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 107.1: Statement of Samuel Parris Concerning Abigail Williams, & Mary Wolcott v.John Proctor), Elizabeth Proctor, Sarah Cloyce, Martha Cory, Rebecca Nurse, Sarah Good, & Dorothy Good v. John Proctor
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 68-69: Sam: Parris Nathl Ingersoll. And Thomas Putnam v. Jno: Procter
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
|
