Deposition of John Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar and Statement of Joseph Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar
Back to PEM: Essex County Court Archives, Vol. 1
|
Back to Archive List
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, no. 216, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 561: Deposition of John Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar and Statement of Joseph Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
Sept. 6, 1692†: Deposition Sworn at Trial
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 2, p. 403: John Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar
Vol. 2, p. 403: Joseph Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 252-253: John Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar
Vol. 1, p. 253: Joseph Tuck v. Dorcas Hoar
|
| Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
#60 (p. 127): John Tuck against Dorcas Hoar, September 6, 1692
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
