Examination of Sarah Carrier
|
Source Citation
|
Thomas Hutchinson, The History of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay, from the Charter of King William and Queen Mary, in 1691, Until the Year 1750, vol. 2, ed. Lawrence Shaw Mayo. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936). p. 34.
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 506: Examination of Sarah Carrier
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
Aug. 11, 1692: Examination
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 201-202: Examination of Sarah Carrier
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 26.2: Examination of Sarah Carrier
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
N/A |
Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |