Examination of Sarah Cloyce & Elizabeth Procter
|
|
Source Citation
|
Thomas Hutchinson, The History of the Province of Massachusetts-Bay, from the Charter of King William and Queen Mary, in 1691, Until the Year 1750, vol. 2, ed. Lawrence Shaw Mayo. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936). pp. 21-23.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 49: Examination of Sarah Cloyce & Elizabeth Procter
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
April 11, 1692: Examination
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 2, pp. 658-661: Examination of Sarah Cloyce and Elizabeth Proctor
|
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 106.3: Examination of Sarah Cloyse and Elizabeth Proctor
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
N/A |
| Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
