A Guide to the Primary Sources of the Salem Witch Trials
Examinations of Richard Carrier, Mary Lacey Sr., Mary Lacey Jr. & Andrew Carrier, Andover Examinations Copy Back
Sheet 3, Recto

Small
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Sheet 3, Verso

Small
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Sheet 4, Recto

Small
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Source Citation Essex Institute Collection, no. 24, 3r-4v, James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009) No. 428: Examinations of Richard Carrier, Mary Lacey Sr., Mary Lacey Jr. & Andrew Carrier, Andover Examinations Copy
    No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document

    indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable

    indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
    [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned

    See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
  • July 22, 1692
  • : Examination
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977) Vol. 2, pp. 529-530: Examination of Richard Carrier
Vol. 2, p. 530: Examination of Andrew Carrier
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019) No. 25.2: Examinations of Richard Carrier, Mary Lacey Jr., Mary Lacey Ar., & Andrew Carrier, Copy
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) N/A
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960) N/A

| Manuscript Archives | Rare Books | Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt | Salem Witchcraft Papers | Woodward | Godbeer | Levin | Search