Testimony of Elizabeth Booth v. Elizabeth Procter, John Procter, & Martha Cory
Back to PEM: Essex County Court Archives, Vol. 1
|
Back to Archive List
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, no. 104 & vol. 2 no. 112, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 384: Testimony of Elizabeth Booth v. Elizabeth Procter, John Procter, & Martha Cory
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
June 30, 1692: Sworn Before the Grand Jury
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, p. 263: Elizabeth Booth v. Martha Corey
Vol. 2, p. 672: Elizabeth Booth v. Elizabeth Proctor and John Proctor
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 111-112: Eliz: Booth v. Eliz: Procter
Vol. 2, pp. 197-198: Eliza Booth v. Martha Corey
|
| Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
