Deposition of Ann Putnam Jr. v. Sarah Buckley
Back to MSA: Massachusetts Archives Collections, Vol. 135 | Back to Archive List
Side 1
(top)


Small
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Source Citation Massachusetts Archives Collection, vol. 135, no. 44, p. 42. Massachusetts State Archives. Boston, MA.
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009) No. 170: Deposition of Ann Putnam Jr. v. Sarah Buckley
    No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document

    indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable

    indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
    [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned

    See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
  • May 18, 1692
  • : Deposition
    No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document

    indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable

    indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
    [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned

    See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
  • Sept. 15, 1692
  • : Sworn Before the Grand Jury
    of Sarah Buckley
    No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document

    indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable

    indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
    [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned

    See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
  • Jan. 4, 1693
  • : Sworn at Trial
    of Sarah Buckley
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977) Vol. 1, p. 148: Ann Putnam, Jr. v. Sarah Buckley
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) N/A
Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011) N/A
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960) N/A

| Manuscript Archives | Rare Books | Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt | Salem Witchcraft Papers | Woodward | Godbeer | Levin | Search