Statement of Susannah Shelden v. Philip English, Sarah Buckley, Mary Whittredge, Bridget Bishop, Giles Cory, Mary English, & Martha Cory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, nos. 153, 154 & 168, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 164: Statement of Susannah Shelden v. Philip English, Sarah Buckley, Mary Whittredge, Bridget Bishop, Giles Cory, Mary English, & Martha Cory
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
May 17, 1692‡: Statement Against
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 105-106: Susannah Sheldon v. Bridget Bishop, Mary English, Phillip English, Giles Corey, and Martha Corey Vol. 1, pp. 320-321: Susannah Sheldon v. Phillip English, Sarah Buckley and Mary Witheridge
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 13.18: Statement of Susannah Sheldon v. Bridget Bishop, Mary English, Phillip English, Giles Corey, and Martha Corey
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 191-193: Susanna Sheldon v. P. English
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
pp. 31-32: Sus Sheldon v. Bridget Bishop
|
|