Examination of George Burroughs and Statement of Abigail Hobbs v. George Burroughs
Back to MHS: Salem Witchcraft Papers | Back to Archive List
Side 1

Small
virginia.edu

Medium
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Side 2

Small
virginia.edu

Medium
virginia.edu

Large
virginia.edu

Source Citation UNCAT MS, Miscellaneous Manuscripts (1692), Massachusetts Historical Society. Boston, MA.
Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011) #63 (pp. 131-132): Examination of George Burroughs (as recorded by Samuel Parris), May 9, 1692
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009) No. 120: Examination of George Burroughs and Statement of Abigail Hobbs v. George Burroughs
  • May 9, 1692: Examination
  • May 11, 1692: Statement
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977) Vol. 1, pp. 153-154: Examination of George Burroughs and Summary of Evidence
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) Vol. 2, pp. 109-111: Examination of George Burrough


Home Page | Manuscript Archives | Rare Books | Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt | Salem Witchcraft Papers | Woodward (1864) | Search